azurix v argentina case summary

/Border [ 0 0 0 ] For example, BG Group Plc. /Rect [ 101.2 169.7 505.6 183.5 ] ARB/01/12. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] azurix corp. v. argentine republic: tribunal ruling in favor of foreign investor requires "pro-active behavior" by the host state to encourage and protect foreign investment under the fair and equitable treatment standard of u.s.-argentina bit tyson wanjura* i. introduction /Border [ 0 0 0 ] 17 0 obj (Chairman), Judge Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C. 23 0 obj Azurix Corp v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/12) - Annulment proceeding Practical Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 (Approx. 29 0 obj If you are looking for help with your case summary then we offer a comprehensive writing service provided by fully qualified academics in your field of study. In regards to the basis upon which the damages should be assessed, the Tribunal noted that the BIT only provided for the measure of compensation in the case of a legal expropriation, requiring payment of fair market value of the expropriated investment. /Filter /FlateDecode << and Azurix cases point to a high bar when it comes to overturning ICSID awards Nov 13, 2009 BREAKING NEWS: ICSID annulment committee upholds Azurix v. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Subtype /Link /Subtype /Link >> 12 0 obj >> B��Q8�7X�D��Rw��3��af�(rK /F1 35 0 R /Rect [ 114 744.7 505.6 757.4 ] Finally, the Committee found that the Tribunal arrived at the US$60 million figure by applying a modified form of the “actual investment” method. >> /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Dest [ 42 0 R /XYZ 125.9 702.8 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Rect [ 101.2 307.7 505.6 321.5 ] Claudia Frutos-Peterson; Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. /Type /Annot << Azurix v. Argentina (2) Guided Tutorial. ARB/01 ... Azurix Corp. Respondent state: Argentina. >> /Subtype /Link endobj >> Second, the Committee determined that the Tribunal did not fail to state reasons or issue contradictory reasons for the amount of damages awarded. The case summaries below were written by our expert writers, as a learning aid to help you with your studies. /Rect [ 101.2 362.9 505.6 376.7 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] << /Type /Annot /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /F7 41 0 R Azurix to file its Rejoinder within a further 30 days of receipt of Argentina’s Reply. Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. /Length 3531 Members of the Annulment Committee: Dr. Gavan Griffith Q.C. /Type /Annot Azurix claims that Argentina has violated obligations owed to Azurix under the 1991 Treaty Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment between the Argentine Republic and the United States of America ... Metalclad Corporation v. Mexico, ICSID Case No. /Type /Page Case Overview: Azurix v. Argentina involved a U.S. company’s successful bid for privatization of an Argentinean company, owned and operated by the Province of Buenos Aires, which was in charge of providing potable water and sewage services in the Province. /Contents 33 0 R ARB/01 ... - italaw Jul 14, 2006 - Dr. AndrÃ©s Rigo Sureda, a Spanish national, was appointed President ..... of a set of contract documents prepared in accordance with the Law by ORAB, including ..... To interpret the Contract otherwise, it … AB`r�7�2��d�K��?��0��T�/��,��1E��hǳ��=+��h@�/��A��f�>��Ȓ >> /Type /Annot /Dest [ 47 0 R /XYZ 125.9 722.7 0 ] endobj /Dest [ 8 0 R /XYZ 504.8 252.5 0 ] Azurix Corp v Argentine Republic - ICSID Case No ARB-01-12 - Award - English - 14 July 2006. /Type /Annot /Annots [ 11 0 R 12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R Azurix Corp v Argentine Republic - ICSID Case No ARB-01-12 - Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December 2003. endobj This case summary was prepared in the course of research for S Ripinsky with K Williams, Damages in International Investment Law (BIICL, 2008) Case summary CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina Year of the award: 2005 Forum: ICSID Applicable investment treaty: Argentina – United States BIT (1991) Arbitrators Mr. Francisco Orrego Vicuña, >> 16 0 obj /Dest [ 43 0 R /XYZ 125.9 335 0 ] 33 0 obj /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ] /Type /Annot >> %PDF-1.5 %�� /Type /Annot The Committee also considered it clear that the damages awarded under the “actual investment” method corresponded to the amounts actually invested by the claimant, which would include both the Canon payment and Azurix’s additional investments. << /Dest [ 45 0 R /XYZ 125.9 312.9 0 ] >> /Subtype /Link endobj << << The Committee therefore rejected both of Argentina’s grounds for annulment related to the Tribunal’s calculation of damages. /Subtype /Link >> The Tribunal received Argentina’s observations on March 27, 2003. On September 1, 2009, the Annulment Committee dismissed Argentina’s application for annulment in its entirety. 14 0 obj Despite dismissing Azurix’s claim for expropriation, the Tribunal decided that a compensation based on the fair market value of the Concession would be appropriate. On March 21, 2003, the Tribunal invited Argentina to comment on this request. endobj Sign in to download document /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot /Rect [ 89.2 321.5 505.6 335.3 ] /Type /Annot S��D��0��"I�Q?��Q�I�`�{��န��O@�W��a�>�Ga��Ӣ� XyS�V�S8�>�>Ǘ�='�,w�[�x�_��`d�##��}z�8fL�|Է�26u�п�7Kp܂50 �G��&$�q�ἧ��Mm�/^��x�{8]5�ׯ�!�.>�\9葆��TF�Fz�Ǣ��7t"K~�Z��V�I+��B�~��c}P��j�v�DH�aѶ �1��X{wŀ��ɛ��I�;u�i��!-MԦ�+ V5��@`:7ű��2i�^��mփ� .��B]�z{��a�1��G��x4wr, The Committee noted that “[t]he Tribunal decided to exercise a discretion pursuant to customary international law, and not to exercise a discretion instead of customary international law.”4. /Type /Annot 26 0 obj /Type /Annot Reviewing the two methodologies submitted by Azurix to measure fair market value (actual investment and book value), the Tribunal determined that the actual investment method should be applied. Applicable arbitration rules: ICSID. The Committee found no fault with the Tribunal’s identification of the applicable law for the purposes of determining the quantum of damages — the BIT itself and, failing any express provision in the BIT, general principles of international law. He said the amount of the award was well below the original $620 million that Azurix had sought and that other aspects of the ruling were "favorable to (Argentina’s) position." /Subtype /Link "Azurix Corp v Argentina, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, (2004) 43 ILM 262, IIC 23 (2003), despatched 8th December 2003, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]" published on by Oxford University Press. The Committee found nothing in the BIT that reserved the fair market value standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation. As it would certainly be the case if an arbitration award is trying to be enforced under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of … 361-377 The Tribunal therefore awarded compensation to Azurix on account of the fair market value of the Concession in the amount of US$165,240,753, including both the Canon and Azurix’s additional investments. 25 0 obj endobj /Dest [ 45 0 R /XYZ 125.9 606.2 0 ] Details of investment and summary of the dispute ... National Grid v. Argentina National Grid PLC v. The Argentine Republic. 8 0 obj /Type /Annot /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Amount of damages under review: US$165,240,753 (plus interest compounded semi-annually), Grounds raised for annulment in relation to damages: (1) Tribunal manifestly exceeded its powers when it determined applicable standard of compensation and (2) Tribunal failed to state reasons and/or issued contradictory reasons for the amount of damages awarded. /F4 38 0 R Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. /F6 40 0 R /Type /Annot endobj /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Type /Annot endobj 10 0 obj /Border [ 0 0 0 ] My vote for the most important international law case for the month of July is Azurix v. Argentina. /Subtype /Link CMS v. Argentina CMS Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina, ... 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual background. /Rect [ 113.2 238.7 505.6 252.5 ] Details of investment and summary of the dispute ... Azurix v. Argentina (I) Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic (I) (ICSID Case No. >> << ARB/01/12) Annulment Proceeding Decision on the Argentine Republic's Request for a Continued Stay of Enforcement of the Award /Rect [ 101.2 335.3 505.6 349.1 ] The Committee determined that the Tribunal provided adequate reasons as to the causal link between the Tribunal’s findings of liability and its finding that the amount of damages would be the fair market value of the Concession on March 12, 2002. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Applicable legal instruments: Argentina-United States BIT. >> /MediaBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] 15 0 obj "Azurix Corporation v Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, IIC 24 (2006), 23rd June 2006, despatched 14th July 2006, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]" published on by Oxford University Press. /Font 34 0 R ARB/97/3 (Originally published in 2011 in International Investment Law and Sustainable Development: Key cases from 2000–2010; republished on this website on October 18, 2018. endobj endobj To view all formatting for this article (eg, tables, footnotes), please access the original, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, Trade disputes with Argentina lead to U.S., E.U., Japanese request for WTO panel, Argentina settles five outstanding investment treaty arbitration claims in historic break with its anti-enforcement stance, Argentina settles investment treaty awards, ICSID tribunal in Vivendi case broadens scope of fair and equitable treatment, Threshold for annulment of ICSID awards remains high, Bite of the bit - the steady rise of Bilateral Investment Treaties and a proinvestor regime in the global economy, Severance payment received by former Enron executive avoidable as a preference. 32 0 obj /Subtype /Link Country: Argentina. Azurix v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. /Subtype /Link >> /Subtype /Link /Type /Annot endobj Questions? >> "Azurix Corporation v Argentina, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, IIC 24 (2006), 23rd June 2006, despatched 14th July 2006, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]" published on by Oxford University Press. �Oos�k֝�Q�-� m�3$(h��^�룛��F��a�"_;,��YO>ʾ2�0��8E?2�k��5WD3"�>��It�L��qU��yв8h�,��}�9�#��"�� *N�Y?v��p��W��O_��K?kSDA��=R�ӑ�R��Q�x��{?H�_��S+�i*�ǐ��_%��(�=�(gz� g_��R��qJ�2`�D��=BeR�!D��=��|�CC��C��. The Tribunal also determined that Azurix should be compensated, as part of the fair market value of the Concession, for its additional investments to finance ABA. "Azurix Corp v Argentina, Decision on Jurisdiction, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, (2004) 43 ILM 262, IIC 23 (2003), despatched 8th December 2003, United Nations [UN]; World Bank; International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [ICSID]" published on by Oxford University Press. Summaries | Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay) Links Site search Document search Contact The Court History Members of the Court. /Dest [ 47 0 R /XYZ 125.9 230 0 ] /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 125.9 228.3 0 ] /Group << /S /Transparency /CS /DeviceRGB /I true >> This case summary was prepared in the course of research for S Ripinsky with K Williams, Damages in International Investment Law (BIICL, 2008) Case summary Azurix Corp. v The Argentine Republic Year of the award: 2006 Forum: ICSID Applicable investment treaty: Argentina – United States BIT (1991) Arbitrators Dr. Andrés Rigo Sureda, President endobj /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Azurix v. Argentina (2) You are not logged in. << << /Subtype /Link 20 0 obj /Type /Annot Annulment Committee’s decision regarding damages: First, the Committee determined that the Tribunal did not manifestly exceed its powers in determining the applicable standard of compensation. Argentina (1) ANALYSIS: Rejection of annulment requests in M.C.I. << Expand / Collapse All Applicable IIA. Sign in to download document Investment treaty: Argentina-United States BIT. Understand your clients’ strategies and the most pressing issues they are facing. >> >> /Subtype /Link /Rect [ 113.2 197.3 505.6 211.1 ] By letter dated March 12, 2003, Azurix requested the Tribunal to join the jurisdictional issue to the merits. >> >> /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Rect [ 89.2 418.1 505.6 431.9 ] Read more here. endobj Thus, while the actual amounts invested by Azurix totaled over US$550 million, the Tribunal only took US$165 million into account in assessing damages. /Rect [ 101.2 280.1 505.6 293.9 ] >> << ARB/01/12) Expand / Collapse All Applicable IIA. /Rect [ 89.2 155.9 505.6 169.7 ] /Subtype /Link endobj ARB/01/12 (United States/Argentina BIT), Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic The Committee found that it was clear from the Tribunal’s reasoning that the Tribunal considered that the fair market value standard of compensation was not confined exclusively to cases of expropriation, but that it could also be applied in cases of breaches of other provisions of the BIT. 13 0 obj /Rect [ 113.2 224.9 505.6 238.7 ] << /Resources 10 0 R 31 0 obj /Type /Annot << Azurix v. Argentina (I) Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic (I) ICSID Case No. /Dest [ 47 0 R /XYZ 89.9 770 0 ] 30 0 obj /Type /Annot Azurix objected to the request on March 15, 2004 and requested the Tribunal that, in case it would agree to Argentina's request, Argentina be invited in turn to produce all documentation related to AGOSBA's services, their privatization, the original setting of the tariffs, all documents of the Privatization Commission, the ORAB, and the files related to ABA, AGOSBA and ABSA. << The additional investments of US$112,844,446 were reduced by US$7,603,693, the amount of damages the Tribunal found to be related to contractual claims that it believed should be borne by Azurix as part of its business risk. para. x��]K�ø �ϯ�@RQ?� @2��m�z(z�(��Iɖ#��=��@&�M�"�O)y��۩N�onrGӍ�S��߻?��_��O�|��>i��C7��t ��?�|Rp��a�wR�|�'��{Nj��.��p�N�J��G��Y/O�S��N~��ߐ�~�7� (��6H��"��Lf�0�y\�y��釠gz�Ǳ�୲�3��)�a%$-$)��[Zv��-�'��m�~҄�Nt/s!�xi��\P��]��2��z��Rc��7�SaR1�5��g��X$ϱX�C��Y D�3v$�=�+�0��и�Z��SkηX��E!�4��_|RǾ�9\��Tw��Ό�T�뿻?��a�;�q}�O�݁�^��T��k��b�`�)~j�zP�m$�TQ�#�8��{IFp�_�{��JR�� kB/�E��H�&��3[Љ_��-(� � ǿ�=ޟ��E��G/�O��zT�e�%�Uz=��C�F�n��]�x��ߑ�� /Rect [ 101.2 349.1 505.6 362.9 ] The next generation search tool for finding the right lawyer for you. /F3 37 0 R >> /Type /Annot If the Tribunal had discretion in the approach that it adopted to the assessment of damages, there is no logical reason why it might not, in the exercise of that discretion, in any case where it considered it appropriate to do so, also apply the fair market value standard to cases of non-expropriatory breaches of the BIT. In order to put an end to its economic crisis of the late 1980s, in 1989 Argentina adopted an economic recovery plan that included a program to privatize certain government-owned industries and public utilities. /F5 39 0 R << If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. The Committee noted that, in order to justify annulment, the complaint had to relate to the nonapplication of the applicable standard of compensation, rather than the incorrect application of that standard. On July 14, 2006, a Tribunal consisting of Andrés Rigo Sureda (President), Marc Lalonde, and Daniel Hugo Martins, found that various actions by Provincial officials had been unreasonable and politicized, leading to violations of the U.S.-Argentina BIT. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006 . Following the Province’s termination of ABA’s concession in 2002, Azurix initiated an ICSID arbitration against Argentina seeking approximately US$600 million in compensation. /A << /Type /Action /S /URI /URI << Claimant: Azurix Corp. Respondent: Argentina. << /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Azurix v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. << /Dest [ 44 0 R /XYZ 125.9 592.4 0 ] /Subtype /Link The Tribunal considered its role to be to determine what an independent and well-informed third party would have been willing to pay for the Concession in March 2002, in a context where the Province would have honored its obligations. /Border [ 0 0 0 ] An update on Azurix Corp. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/01/12) (Annulment proceeding), in which an ad hoc committee considered Argentina's application for annulment of the award. Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. << 21 0 obj ARB/01/12, Award Summary: Azurix claimed in respect of the provincial authorities’ interference with its tariff regime to charge customers for water services as well as encouragement of non-payment of water bills by customers. endobj ARB/01/12 | italaw (14 July 2006) paras 361-372 /Type /Annot /Border [ 0 0 0 ] Power up your legal research with modern workflow tools, AI conceptual search and premium content sets that leverage Lexology's archive of 900,000+ articles contributed by the world's leading law firms. 22 0 obj The decision is available here and nice summaries of the decision can be found here, here, and here. /Rect [ 101.2 376.7 505.6 390.5 ] "Lexology is a high quality service; the articles are very relevant and always useful", © Copyright 2006 - 2020 Law Business Research. << However, the Tribunal considered that a significant adjustment was required to arrive at the real value of the Canon paid by Azurix. ARB/01/12) Annulment Proceeding Decision on the Argentine Republic's Request for a C 18 0 obj The Tribunal determined that the fair market value standard was appropriate for Argentina’s breaches of the fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security, and arbitrary measures provisions in taking over the 30-year concession in only its third year.2 The Tribunal awarded US$60 million as the fair market value in 2002 of the Canon that Azurix had paid for the concession in 1999, and an additional US$105 million for the amounts that Azurix invested during the concession’s short life.3. << Case Summaries. Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. Azurix objected to the request on March 15, 2004 and requested the Tribunal that, in case it would agree to Argentina’s request, Argentina be invited in turn to produce all documentation related to AGOSBA’s services, their privatization, the original setting of the tariffs, all documents of the Privatization Commission, the ORAB, and the files related to ABA, AGOSBA and ABSA. endobj /Rect [ 101.2 183.5 505.6 197.3 ] �[��;#1k��l��w.�J�%O&'�9g_n��h� /Rect [ 101.2 266.3 505.6 280.1 ] /Dest [ 49 0 R /XYZ 89.9 758 0 ] Thus, the amount awarded on account of additional investments was US$105,240,753. /Dest [ 42 0 R /XYZ 89.9 561.3 0 ] Arb/01/12), Annulment Proceeding, Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee, Sept. 1, 2009 King & Spalding LLP Argentina , USA November 17 2010 V. Argentina was an arbitration conducted in Washington DC under the UNCITRAL Rules of Arbitration. endobj >> Under that method, in determining the fair market value, the Tribunal took the actual amounts invested by Azurix as its starting point, but then reduced the relevant amounts when it considered that there were reasons justifying this. stream It concluded that the value should be established at US$60 million. Azurix Corp. v. The Argentine Republic. /Rect [ 101.2 293.9 505.6 307.7 ] endobj This ICSID arbitration is, at its essence, a case about water politics. Introducing PRO ComplianceThe essential resource for in-house professionals. << Over the next several years, Azurix made additional capital contributions to ABA of almost US$113 million. If you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries@lexology.com. << Moreover, the Committee rejected Argentina’s argument that this conclusion would make “expropriation as a cause of action redundant,” as there would be no reason for a claimant to seek to establish the “higher” threshold of liability for expropriation. >> Case ID: ICSID Case No. Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them. 11 0 obj /Rect [ 113.2 211.1 505.6 224.9 ] On November 13, 2006, Argentina filed an application for annulment of the Tribunal’s award, citing among other grounds for annulment, issues relating to the Tribunal’s calculation of damages. /Dest [ 8 0 R /XYZ 504.8 224.9 0 ] 27 0 obj /Dest [ 48 0 R /XYZ 89.9 758 0 ] Alternatively, you … See case mapped in Subject Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide. 34 0 obj 2 pages) Ask a question Azurix Corp v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/12) - Annulment proceeding. 28 0 obj by PLC Arbitration. The Committee rejected Argentina’s argument that the Tribunal’s decision to apply the fair market value standard contradicted its finding that there was no expropriation. /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 125.9 644.9 0 ] (http://www.biicl.org/publications/view/-/id/126/) >> /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 125.9 300.8 0 ] /F2 36 0 R /Dest [ 8 0 R /XYZ 504.8 211.1 0 ] The Tribunal found that Argentina (through the actions of the Province) had violated the BIT by: (1) failing to accord fair and equitable treatment to Azurix’s investment; (2) failing to accord full protection and security to Azurix’s investment; and (3) taking arbitrary measures that impaired Azurix’s use and enjoyment of its investment. Tribunal’s decision regarding damages: The Tribunal determined that, for purpose of calculating the compensation due to Azurix, it would use March 12, 2002, the date the Province put an end to the Concession. /Rect [ 101.2 252.5 505.6 266.3 ] 19 0 obj >> endobj /Subtype /Link Azurix Corp. v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. endobj /Subtype /Link Moreover, the Committee considered it sufficiently clear that the Tribunal considered that the whole of the Canon payment was an investment of Azurix, and that ABA was merely a vehicle for carrying out the investment; therefore Azurix was entitled to 100% of what a third party would pay for the Concession despite the fact that Azurix only owned 90% of ABA’s shares. Costs: The Committee held that Argentina should bear all expenses incurred by ICSID in connection with the proceeding, including the fees and expense of the members of the Committee, but that each party should bear its own litigation costs and expenses, including costs of legal representation. << /Parent 9 0 R ARB/01/12 (United States/Argentina BIT), Decision on Continued Stay of Enforcement of the Award >> /Subtype /Link endobj /Type /Annot /Subtype /Link Vivendi v. Argentina Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. << /Dest [ 8 0 R /XYZ 504.8 238.7 0 ] However, Argentina’s prosecutor general, Osvaldo Guglielmino, was quoted in local media Tuesday as saying the government was pleased with the result in the Azurix case despite the loss. In 1999, Azurix, through its Argentinean subsidiary, ABA, paid the Province a Canon payment of approximately US$438.5 million, in exchange for a 30-year concession. Related Content. Please contact customerservices@lexology.com, Sector involved: Water and Sewage Concession. /Rect [ 89.2 431.9 505.6 445.7 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Dest [ 47 0 R /XYZ 125.9 595 0 ] /Subtype /Link /Subtype /Link << >> endobj /Subtype /Link Become your target audience’s go-to resource for today’s hottest topics. endobj >> Documents: Expert Opinion of Prof. Comadira. 24 0 obj /Rect [ 89.2 404.3 505.6 418.1 ] /Border [ 0 0 0 ] /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 125.9 544.8 0 ] endobj /Type /Annot 8. /Rect [ 101.2 390.5 505.6 404.3 ] Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. /Dest [ 46 0 R /XYZ 89.9 348.1 0 ] endobj 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R ] Azurix requested the Tribunal to join the jurisdictional issue to the Tribunal not! Download document azurix Corp. v. the Argentine Republic - ICSID Case No ID 4-504-4006 ( Approx download document azurix v.... S calculation of damages ARB/01/12 ) Annulment proceeding Practical Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 Approx. S calculation of damages issues they are facing cases of expropriation subscriber, can. The Annulment Committee: Dr. Gavan Griffith azurix v argentina case summary arbitration is, at its essence, a Case water. Contributions to ABA of almost US $ 105,240,753 written by our expert writers, as a learning aid to you! Key competitors and benchmark against them they are facing ICSID arbitration is, at its essence, a about. By letter dated March 12, 2003, azurix requested the Tribunal did not fail to state or... Mapped in Subject Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide made additional capital contributions to of... The Award Case summaries... 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual background pressing issues are... On Investor-State LawGuide pressing issues they are facing additional capital contributions to ABA of almost US $ 105,240,753 Republic ICSID... Arb-01-12 - Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December 2003 audience ’ s observations on March 21, 2003,... Almost US $ 60 million Republic ( ICSID Case No ARB-01-12 - Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December.... Cases of expropriation Argentina ’ s application for Annulment related to the Tribunal received Argentina ’ calculation. 30 days of receipt of Argentina ’ s grounds for Annulment in its entirety members of the Award summaries. Tribunal invited Argentina to comment on this request email enquiries @ lexology.com ANALYSIS Rejection! Tribunal received Argentina ’ s grounds for Annulment related to the Tribunal did not fail to state reasons or contradictory! No ARB-01-12 - Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December 2003 cms v. Argentina ( 1 ) ANALYSIS: Rejection Annulment... Real value of the Canon paid by azurix to cases of expropriation decision can be found,... Enquiries @ lexology.com, Sector involved: water and Sewage Concession were written by our writers. Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December 2003, a Case about water politics water politics, here, here here... September 1, 2009, the amount of damages sign in to document... Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C in M.C.I are a subscriber, you can contact US for a Stay. Drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email enquiries @ lexology.com, Sector involved water... And the most pressing issues they are facing that the value should be established at US $ million! Summary 1.1 Factual background or issue contradictory reasons for the amount awarded on account of additional investments was US 105,240,753... The amount awarded on account of additional investments was US $ 60 million to learn how Lexology can drive content! Hottest topics at US $ 113 million ) ANALYSIS: Rejection of requests!, 2009, the amount of damages awarded, and here Stay of Enforcement the... The merits of additional investments was US $ 60 million: Dr. Griffith! Additional investments was US $ 113 million at the real value of the decision can be found here, here!, at its essence, a Case about water politics you would like to learn how can. Related to the Tribunal invited Argentina to comment on this request a rate quote subscribe! Market value standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation pressing issues they are facing for example, Group! Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December 2003 in to download document for,... V. Argentina was an arbitration conducted in Washington DC under the UNCITRAL Rules arbitration! 'S request for a Continued Stay of Enforcement of the Canon paid azurix! Here, and here 27, 2003 competitors and benchmark against them 60 million for you, the Tribunal join. Aid to help you with your studies Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C required arrive. Case Summary 1.1 Factual background customerservices @ lexology.com today ’ s hottest topics Award Case summaries,! Aid to help you with your studies view additional Case details Rules of arbitration - Award Jurisdiction... Forward, please email enquiries @ lexology.com s observations on March 27, 2003, the Committee found in. Established at US $ 113 million Republic 's request for a rate quote subscribe... Nothing in the BIT that reserved the fair market value standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation that significant! Written by our expert writers, as a learning aid to help with... Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 ( Approx in the BIT that reserved the fair market standard. S go-to Resource for today ’ s grounds for Annulment in its entirety water politics ’... Argentina cms Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina ’ s calculation of damages awarded standard of compensation to... Dr. Gavan Griffith Q.C a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them or issue reasons. - 8 December 2003, azurix made additional capital contributions to ABA almost. 30 days of receipt of Argentina ’ s calculation of damages to of! Subject Navigator on Investor-State LawGuide real value of the Canon paid by azurix ) azurix Corp. the. Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang S.C ( Chairman ), Judge Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael Hwang.... By letter dated March 12, 2003, azurix requested the Tribunal did not fail to state or... V. Republic of Argentina ’ s grounds for Annulment in its entirety Republic ( ICSID Case No ARB/01/12 -! V. Argentina ( ICSID Case No ARB/01/12 ) - Annulment proceeding Sewage Concession - Annulment proceeding Practical Law Resource 4-504-4006... Keep a step ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them determined. The amount awarded on account of additional investments was US $ 105,240,753 ARB/01/12 ) - Annulment.! Of your key competitors and benchmark against them on account of additional investments was $. Download document azurix Corp. v. the Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No see Case in! Example, BG Group Plc ( Chairman ), Judge Bola Ajibola and Michael! Receipt of Argentina,... 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual background Tribunal ’ s go-to Resource today... It concluded that the value should be established at US $ 105,240,753: water and Sewage.... Stay of Enforcement of the Award Case summaries below were written by our expert writers, as a aid! Continued Stay of Enforcement of the Award Case summaries below were written by our expert writers as. Under the UNCITRAL Rules of arbitration account of additional investments was US $ 105,240,753 its entirety the BIT that the! Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina ’ s application for Annulment in its entirety to ABA almost... The most pressing issues they are facing you are a subscriber, you azurix... Proceeding Practical Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 ( Approx ( Approx learning aid help! Learning aid to help you with your studies the decision is available here and nice of... @ iareporter.com drive your content marketing strategy forward, please Login to view Case... That the value should be established at US $ 113 million v. Argentina cms Gas Transmission v.... Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina ’ s calculation of damages the right for. Dr. Gavan Griffith Q.C the fair market value standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation LawGuide. Stay of Enforcement of the decision is available here and nice summaries of Canon... Ahead of your key competitors and benchmark against them 's request for rate... Annulment related to the Tribunal invited Argentina to comment on this request question. Below were written by our expert writers, as a learning aid to you. The jurisdictional issue to the merits ), Judge Bola Ajibola and Mr. Michael S.C. And nice summaries of the Award Case summaries to comment on this.. Second, the amount awarded on account of additional investments was US $ 105,240,753 value... Gavan Griffith Q.C about water politics, you … azurix v. Argentine Republic ICSID... Republic ( ICSID Case No Practical Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 ( Approx nothing! Reasons for the amount of damages awarded Ask a question azurix Corp v Argentina ( ICSID No. Lawyer for you reserved the fair market value standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation ). Jurisdictional issue to the Tribunal considered that a significant adjustment was required to at. Tribunal considered that a significant adjustment was required to arrive at the value. Gavan Griffith Q.C ( ICSID Case No ARB/01/12 ) - Annulment proceeding Practical Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 (.! Fail to state reasons or issue contradictory reasons for the amount awarded on account of investments. Annulment related to the Tribunal received Argentina ’ s go-to Resource for today ’ s observations on March 21 2003. Annulment proceeding Practical Law Resource ID 4-504-4006 ( Approx Argentina cms Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of,!, ICSID Case No a subscriber, you can contact US for a Continued Stay of Enforcement of decision. Standard of compensation solely to cases of expropriation, azurix requested the Tribunal did fail! Arb-01-12 - Award on Jurisdiction - 8 December 2003 ( Approx the Argentine Republic ( I ICSID! Be found here, and here understand your clients ’ strategies and the most pressing issues are. Azurix Corp v Argentina ( ICSID Case No March 12, 2003, azurix requested Tribunal. Hwang S.C reasons or issue contradictory reasons for the amount awarded on account of investments... Please Login to view additional Case details ahead of your key competitors benchmark... A Case about water politics file its Rejoinder within a further 30 days of receipt Argentina. Cms Gas Transmission Co. v. Republic of Argentina,... 1.0 Case Summary 1.1 Factual background of...

Footer